John Doe Objection to LDS Church Motion, BSA Bankruptcy, July 21, 2025

Download for free (enter “0”) or donate any amount you like.

Minimum amount: $0

Description

This objection is a response to a motion the Mormon church filed on May 29, 2025 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, which oversaw the Boy Scouts of America’s (BSA’s) $2.4 billion bankruptcy reorganization.

In its motion, the church argued that Richard Kent James’s abuse of John Doe was all Scouting-related (and therefore resolved by the BSA bankruptcy settlement), and asked judge Laurie Silverstein to force Doe to dismiss his Maryland lawsuit with prejudice.

The church’s motion in May was sealed. The only way we (Floodlit.org) know what it said is via Doe’s response (via his attorneys Joseph Rhoades and Robert Pfister), and the only way we know what Doe said is because we dug like hell to find it. We’ll get to that in a minute.

On July 14, 2025, James was deposed. He said, “I wouldn’t have known [Doe] if not for scouting” and reversed his story from 2002, insisting, “My abuse of [Doe] happened with scouting. That’s the only reason I knew [Doe].”

On July 21, 2025, Doe’s attorneys filed an objection to the church’s motion, calling it “deeply disingenuous” and accusing the church of “piec[ing] together snippets of the record to construct a curated version of the facts” to make it sound as though Doe never alleged that any of James’s sexual abuse of him took place in a non-Scouting setting.

Doe accused the church of excluding all but the first page of James’s 20-page BSA Ineligible Volunteer file (or “perversion file”) in its May motion in order to leave out a 2001 news article revealing that the original criminal charges against James resulted from allegations that he abused Doe not only at Marriott’s home, but also on scout trips while working for the church as Doe’s scout leader.

Calling the church’s logic “perverse,” Doe’s attorneys wrote, “In 2022, TCJC at least was offering to pay an additional $250 million to be shielded from claims […] like Doe’s. But the Court rejected the settlement agreement and TCJC kept its $250 million. To accept its argument now would be to give it for free something that the Court was not willing to let it buy for $250 million in 2022.”

In 2022, the church attempted to include Doe in proposing to pay $250 million to be released from liability for ALL​ claims of sex abuse that involved Scouting in any way, and attempted to define “Scouting” as inclusive of virtually every Church-related activity.

That year, Judge Silverstein rejected the church’s proposal, saying it went too far in attempting to gain protection from abuse claims that were only loosely tied to scouting activities.

Doe’s filing and its six attached exhibits cannot be downloaded on the BSA bankruptcy court docket website, despite not being listed as sealed. Floodlit reviewed the entire docket – over 13,000 documents – as far as we can tell Doe’s objection is the only docket item that is censored from the public eye.

After extended investigative efforts, Floodlit.org obtained Doe’s filing and attachments. We want the public to have them, and will make them available on our website.

Related info:

 

Related FLOODLIT Case Reports

 

Why FLOODLIT offers free court documents - and how you can help

FLOODLIT has compiled and published thousands of reports about sex crimes allegedly perpetrated by participating members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon/LDS church), and about the Mormon church’s responses to individual sex crime accusations, allegations of organizational misconduct regarding sexual abuse, and public demands for reform.

Our mission is to report fairly and accurately on this important topic, and to help abuse survivors heal.

Most court documents are public records, but finding and obtaining them can be difficult, expensive, stressful and time-consuming.

These public records — criminal filings, civil suits, and more — hold the power to reveal patterns, enable accountability, and spark change.

So, we are offering this public document as a free download, and encourage you to consider making a donation today.

As a non-profit newsroom, we depend on donations from the public to keep our lights shining. Your support directly funds our investigative reporting as we purchase copies of court documents, conduct interviews, use research tools, and compile and publish case information. Thank you for supporting courage and integrity!

 

Terms of Use

Please note: By accessing this document, you agree to use information in it for personal research only; to not violate any laws, harm others, or attempt to contact any parties involved in court proceedings; and to abide by the terms of use at https://floodlit.org/terms/.