Karey Clark Zimmerman

Sources

1. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al [case 2:25-cv-00206], PacerMonitor, February 10, 2025.
2. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA [REDACTED], Plaintiff(s), vs. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, et al., Defendant(s), Justia, July 22, 2025.
3. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al , Justia, January 30, 2025.
4. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al, Unicourt, January 30, 2025.
5. ZIMMERMAN v. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS , Leagle, April 23, 2026.
6. Vista Serena Showcase / Karey Zimmerman - Project Coordinator, KNB Associates, June 30, 2026.
7. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al , Pacer Monitor, January 30, 2025.
8. [REDACTED],Plaintiff v. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (a corporation), KAREY ZIMMERMAN (an individual), and DOES 1-500, Inclusive, Defendants , Justia, June 23, 2026.

• 1. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al [case 2:25-cv-00206]

  • 20250210
  • Court record
  • PacerMonitor

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  ANNE ANDREWS California Bar No. 103280
  aa@andrewsthornton.com
  ANDREWS & THORNTON 4701 Von Karman Ave, Ste. 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 748-1000 Facsimile: (949) 315-3540
  (Pro Hac Vice forthcoming)
  ALAN A. GREENBERG Nevada Bar No. 15922
  AGreenberg@GGTrialLaw.com
  JEMMA E. DUNN Nevada Bar No. 16229
  JDunn@GGTrialLaw.com
  GREENBERG GROSS LLP
  1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 730 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702) 777-0888 Facsimile: (702) 777-0801
  Attorneys for [Plaintiff] Zimmerman
  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC
  Document 4
  Filed 01/31/25
  Page 1 of 12
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
  [Plaintiff] Zimmerman, Plaintiff,
  v.
  THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (a corporation), KAREY ZIMMERMAN (an individual), and DOES 1-500, Inclusive,
  Defendants.
  Case No. 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC
  AMENDED COMPLAINT (DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL)
  1. Illegally Transporting a Minor for Sex 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (a) (Against All DEFENDANTS)
  2. Sexual Abuse of a Minor (Against KAREY)
  3. Negligence (Against L.D.S.)
  Plaintiff [Plaintiff] Zimmerman by and through her attorneys, Greenberg Gross LLP, bring this action against Defendants THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (a corporation), KAREY ZIMMERMAN (an individual) and DOES 1-500.
  Case No.
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 2 of 12
  1.
  (“L.D.S.”) had actual notice that Defendant KAREY ZIMMERMAN (“KAREY”) was sexually abusing his daughter, Plaintiff [Plaintiff] Zimmerman (“PLAINTIFF”). Despite this knowledge, L.D.S. did nothing to prevent further abuse from occurring.
  II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
  Defendant THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
  2.
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
  This Court properly has subject matter jurisdiction to hear civil claims brought
  3. Venue in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 in that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims asserted herein occurred in this District, and Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this District.
  4. State law claims two and three are timely brought pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes § 11.215. Claims two and three allege physical, psychological, and emotional injuries and damages suffered as a result of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of PLAINTIFF when she was under the age of 18. PLAINTIFF can bring an action against the perpetrator of her abuse at any time and has until the age of thirty-eight years old to bring an action against any other defendant that is liable for the injuries she suffered. As such, PLAINTIFF’s complaint is timely.
  5. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a) over the state law claims, including the claim for punitive damages, as these claims are so related to the federal claims in this action that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Specifically, the state law claims arise from the same transaction and rely on identical facts for their resolution as the federal claims.

  -2-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC
  Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 3 of 12
  1
  2
  3 A. 4
  5 adoptive father of PLAINTIFF.
  6 7. KAREY and his wife, [MZ] (“[MZ]”) adopted
  7 PLAINTIFF when she was seven years old. Upon information and belief, KAREY adopted
  8 PLAINTIFF with the goal of grooming and sexually abusing her. KAREY knew that his wife
  9 could not have children, and decided to adopt PLAINTIFF so he could groom, sexually abuse, and
  10 manipulate PLAINTIFF into being in an intimate relationship.
  11 8. After sexually abusing PLAINTIFF when she was around the ages of seven to nine,
  12 PLAINTIFF reported the abuse to [MZ] who then reported the ongoing sexual abuse to the
  13 presiding bishop within the Utah Ward that PLAINTIFF’s family attended. However, the bishop
  14 and the ward did nothing to protect PLAINTIFF or report to law enforcement the sexual abuse that
  15 had occurred.
  16 9. Upon information and belief, KAREY moved to Nevada so that he could transport
  17 PLAINTIFF to a new location where the L.D.S. congregation would not know about the sexual
  18 abuse he perpetrated on his daughter. Upon information and belief, KAREY transported
  19 PLAINTIFF to Nevada with the goal of grooming her for unlawful sexual activities and the aim of
  20 impregnating PLAINTIFF when she was old enough to conceive children.
  21 B. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
  III. DEFENDANT PARTIES
  Perpetrator Defendant KAREY ZIMMERMAN
  6. Defendant KAREY ZIMMERMAN is an individual member of L.D.S. and the
  22
  23 State of Utah, with its principal place of business at 50 East North Temple, Floor 20, Salt Lake
  24 City, State of Utah 84150. L.D.S. operates churches, meeting houses, wards, and stakes within
  25 Nevada. The presiding bishops and stake presidents in Nevada act under the supervision and
  26 control of L.D.S. L.D.S financially benefits from its activity in Nevada by collecting tithes and
  27 donations from it. This Court has jurisdiction over L.D.S. as a result of the sexual abuse of
  28 Plaintiff in Nevada, the illegal transportation of Plaintiff from Utah to Nevada for the purposes of
  -3-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
  10. L.D.S. is a corporation duly organized and operating pursuant to the laws of the

  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 4 of 12
  1 unlawful sexual activities, and the resulting coverup. L.D.S. purposefully availed itself of the
  2 benefits of doing business in Nevada. L.D.S. enabled the abuse and illegal transportation of
  3 PLAINTIFF and aided in concealing the abuse from law enforcement. L.D.S. benefited from this
  4 coverup by protecting its reputation and ensuring a steady flow of tithes and donations from its
  5 members.
  6 11. At all times relevant to the allegations listed herein, Plaintiff was a member of
  7 L.D.S. in different wards located in Utah and Nevada.
  8 C. Doe Defendants 1-500
  9
  10 Defendants DOES 1 through 500, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiffs who are therefore ignorant
  11 of the true names and sue said Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiffs believe and allege
  12 that each of the Defendants designated herein by fictitious names is in some manner legally
  13 responsible for the events and happenings herein referred to and caused damages proximately and
  14 foreseeably to Plaintiffs as alleged herein. The true names, whether corporate, individual or
  15 otherwise, of Defendants 1 through 500, inclusive, are presently unknown to Plaintiff, which
  16 therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious names, and will seek leave to amend this
  17 Complaint to show their true names and capacities when same have been ascertained.
  18 13. At all times hereinafter alleged, “DEFENDANTS” or “All DEFENDANTS”
  19 include all herein named Defendants as well as Defendants DOES 1 through 500, inclusive.
  20 14. At all times herein alleged, each of the DEFENDANTS was the agent, servant,
  21 partner, aider and abettor, co-conspirator and joint venturer of each of the remaining
  22 DEFENDANTS herein and was at all times operating and acting within the course, purpose and
  23 scope of said agency, service, employment, partnership, conspiracy and joint venture and rendered
  24 substantial assistance and encouragement to the other DEFENDANTS, knowing that their conduct
  25 constituted a breach of duty owed to Plaintiffs and unlawful harm to Plaintiffs.

  -4-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
  12. The true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, or otherwise, of

  IV. PLAINTIFF PARTIES
  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC
  Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 5 of 12
  15.
  resident of Nevada and Utah. At the time of filing this complaint, PLAINTIFF is a resident of Utah.
  PLAINTIFF was at all relevant times to the tortious conduct herein mentioned a
  A.
  V.
  FACTUAL BACKGROUND
  L.D.S.’s Negligence Failed to Prevent [Plaintiff] Zimmerman from Being Sexually
  Assaulted by Her Father
  16. PLAINTIFF, and her parents KAREY AND [MZ] (collectively known as “PARENTS”) were long-standing members of L.D.S. who paid tithes and regularly attended L.D.S.-sponsored events.
  17. When PLAINTIFF was seven years old, her biological parents struggled with drug addiction and were not able to support her. PLAINTIFF was subsequently adopted by PARENTS. Upon information and belief, PLAINTIFF’s adoption was handled through an affiliated entity of L.D.S. called L.D.S. Family Services. At the time of the adoption, PLAINTIFF and PARENTS were living in South Jordan, Utah.
  18. Shortly after being adopted, KAREY started sexually abusing PLAINTIFF at their home. The abuse involved fondling and violent penetration while PLAINTIFF was around the ages of seven and eight years old. The sexual abuse occurred in PLAINTIFF’s room and was so traumatic that PLAINTIFF needed to disassociate during the experience.
  19. Shortly before PLAINTIFF turned nine years old, and after at least three incidents of abuse, PLAINTIFF told [MZ] that KAREY was sexually abusing her. [MZ] informed the presiding bishop of the ward they attended about the sexual abuse that she learned about. As a result of [MZ] reporting the abuse, KAREY was forced to stop taking sacraments and participating in religious ceremonies., L.D.S. did not report the abuse to law enforcement and took no steps to stop the abuse from further occurring. L.D.S. clergy members, at ///
  -5-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 6 of 12
  1 all relevant times, were mandatory reporters under Utah law and were compelled by law to report
  2 the abuse to the proper authorities.
  3 20. If L.D.S. and its local leaders had properly reported the fact that KAREY was
  4 sexually abusing PLAINTIFF, then PLAINTIFF could have been spared from having to endure
  5 later incidents of abuse.
  6 21. When PLAINTIFF was around eleven years old, PARENTS moved their family
  7 from Utah to Las Vegas, Nevada. PLAINTIFF began attending L.D.S. services at one of the wards
  8 in Las Vegas, along with both of her parents. Despite having knowledge of KAREY’s propensity
  9 to abuse minors, L.D.S. did not take any steps to prevent KAREY from continuing to abuse
  10 PLAINTIFF after PARENTS moved to Nevada. Upon information and belief, L.D.S. did not
  11 report KAREY’s propensity to abuse minors to local congregation leaders in Las Vegas, despite
  12 knowing that KAREY still had PLAINTIFF in his care and would be around young children while
  13 attending church services.
  14 22. When PLAINTIFF was around fifteen years old, PARENTS moved their family
  15 from Las Vegas to Anthem, Nevada. After PARENTS moved to Anthem, KAREY began sexually
  16 assaulting PLAINTIFF again. After turning fifteen, PLAINTIFF was assaulted at least five to ten
  17 times involving violent and traumatic penetration and fondling.
  18 23. KAREY manipulated PLAINTIFF into not reporting the abuse again by informing
  19 her that the reason he was raping her was because of the lack of intimacy he had with [MZ].
  20 KAREY tried to convince PLAINTIFF that the abuse was necessary to keep their family together
  21 and to prevent him from having extramarital affairs with other women.
  22 24. Upon information and belief, KAREY’s motivation for sexually abusing
  23 PLAINTIFF was to impregnate her. KAREY’s motivation was fueled by the fact that [MZ]
  24 was unable to conceive her own children, and KAREY was forced to adopt children. Upon
  25 information and belief, KAREY’s motivation for moving to Nevada was to move to a ward where
  26 the congregants and Bishop were not aware of the abuse he perpetrated on PLAINTIFF, and where
  27 he could continue to groom PLAINTIFF until she was old enough to conceive children.
  28 ///
  -6-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  VI.
  PUNITIVE DAMAGES ALLEGATIONS
  PLAINTIFF repeats and re-allege the allegations set forth in the above paragraphs.
  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 7 of 12
  26.
  abusing PLAINTIFF. Despite this knowledge, L.D.S. took no steps to protect PLAINTIFF and other child congregates, who L.D.S. knew were vulnerable to KAREY’s abuse.
  27. Despite the reports of KAREY’s predatory behavior, L.D.S. did not investigate or report the allegations to the proper authorities, instead making surface levels attempts at punishing KAREY by preventing him from taking sacraments.
  28. Despite knowing that KAREY posed a threat to his own family and other children outside his family, L.D.S. did not take the proper steps to ensure the protection of their minor congregates when KAREY decided to move his family to Nevada.
  29. Such conduct is willful, wanton and reckless, justifying an award of punitive damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
  VII.
  FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF ILLEGALLY TRANSPORTING A MINOR FOR SEX IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a)
  (Against All Defendants)
  At all times herein, L.D.S. knew that KAREY was a child predator that was
  30.
  Complaint as though set forth in full in this cause of action.
  PLAINTIFF incorporates by reference each and every prior paragraph of this
  31. An individual who, while a minor under the age of 18 years old, was a victim of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423, and suffered personal injury as a result, may bring a civil action for damages and reasonable attorney’s fees against the person who transported them or conspired to transport them under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
  32. A person is in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (a) if they knowingly transport an individual, attempt to transport an individual, or conspire to transport an individual, “who has not attained the age of 16 years in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any commonwealth territory
  -7-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  or possession of the United States with intent that the individual engages in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense”
  33. While PLAINTIFF was a minor under the age of 16, KAREY transported PLAINTIFF from Utah to Nevada with the intent of grooming and sexually assaulting PLAINTIFF.
  34. For any of the above acts, KAREY could and should have been criminally charged for sexual abuse of a minor.
  35. L.D.S. conspired with KAREY by failing to report KAREY to the proper authorities and by allowing KAREY to join a new ward in Nevada, after he had been exposed as a child predator in Utah.
  36. L.D.S. and KAREY are liable pursuant to § 2423 and PLAINTIFF is entitled to bring this civil action pursuant to § 2255(a).
  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 8 of 12
  10
  11
  12
  13 37. As a direct result of the transporting and conspiring, PLAINTIFF suffered severe
  physical and emotional harm. As a direct and proximate cause of transporting PLAINTIFF, PLAINTIFF was left in the care of a known abuser, KAREY. As a result, KAREY repeatedly abused and raped PLAINTIFF.
  SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
  SEXUAL ABUSE OF A MINOR
  (Against KAREY and Does 1-500)
  38. PLAINTIFF incorporates by reference each and every prior paragraph of this
  Complaint as though set forth in full in this cause of action.

  of abuse. KAREY took advantage of this to repeatedly sexually abuse PLAINTIFF, abuse that
  25
  included penetration and fondling. PLAINTIFF did not consent to the acts, nor could PLAINTIFF
  26
  have consented to the acts given her young age at the time of the abuse.
  27 28
  ///
  39. While PLAINTIFF was a member of the L.D.S. community and reliant upon L.D.S., KAREY took advantage of the protection L.D.S. was providing him by concealing reports
  -8-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  40. As a direct and legal result of the sexual abuse by KAREY, PLAINTIFF experienced physical, emotional, and psychological injuries for which she is entitled to monetary damages and other relief.
  THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF NEGLIGENCE (Against L.D.S. and DOES 1-500)
  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 9 of 12
  41.
  fully set forth and brought in this cause of action.
  PLAINTIFF incorporates by reference each and every prior allegation as though
  42. DEFENDANTS are persons or entities who owed a duty of care to the PLAINTIFF.
  43. As mandated reporters of child abuse, L.D.S. clergy had a special relationship with minor congregates and owed a statutory duty to protect PLAINTIFF from reasonably foreseeable harm. As stated above, L.D.S. failed in this duty when they failed to communicate reports of sexual abuse to the proper law enforcement while PLAINTIFF was being abused by KAREY in Utah.
  44. Despite receiving reports of KAREY sexually abusing PLAINTIFF, L.D.S. took no steps to report the abuse to law enforcement or stop the abuse from continuing. Instead, L.D.S. concluded the abuse and conspired to allow KAREY to transport PLAINTIFF to Nevada, where he could more freely continue abusing PLAINTIFF.
  45. It was reasonably foreseeable the fact that KAREY was sexually abusing PLAINTIFF that the abuse would continue. By allowing KAREY to transport PLAINTIFF to Nevada, it was reasonably foreseeable that KAREY would continue to abuse PLAINTIFF while outside of the purview of a ward that had actual notice of his predatory behavior.
  46. PLAINTIFF experienced physical, emotional and psychological injuries for which she is entitled to monetary damages and other relief.

  -9-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC
  Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 10 of 12

  VIII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
  WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment as follows:
  As to the First Claim for Relief and all DEFENDANTS, damages to the PLAINTIFF according to proof including as applicable:
  1. Past and future medical and care expenses of PLAINTIFF;
  2. Other economic loss;
  3. Non-economic loss according to proof:
  (a) Compensation for physical pain and discomfort;
  (b) Compensation for fright, nervousness, anxiety, worry, and apprehension;
  4. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest to the Plaintiff according to proof;
  5. Reasonable costs to the PLAINTIFF as provided by law;
  6. Attorney’s fees pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255;
  As to the Second Claim for Relief and to KAREY:
  1. Past and future medical and care expenses of PLAINTIFF;
  2. Other economic loss;
  3. Non-economic loss according to proof:
  (a) Compensation for physical pain and discomfort;
  (b) Compensation for fright, nervousness, anxiety, worry, and apprehension;
  4. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest to the PLAINTIFF according to proof;
  5. Reasonable costs to the PLAINTIFF as provided by law;
  -10-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 11 of 12

  As to the Third Claim for Relief and to L.D.S., damages to the PLAINTIFF according to proof including as applicable:
  1. Past and future medical and care expenses of PLAINTIFF;
  2. Other economic loss;
  3. Non-economic loss according to proof:
  (a) Compensation for physical pain and discomfort;
  (b) Compensation for fright, nervousness, anxiety, worry, and apprehension;
  4. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest to the PLAINTIFF according to proof;
  5. Reasonable costs to the PLAINTIFF as provided by law;
  As to the First Claim for Relief and all DEFENDANTS, by virtue of knowing and intentional violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2255, awarding to PLAINTIFF’s punitive damages. As to the Second Claim for Relief and KAREY, by virtue of wanton, malicious, willful, and/or cruel conduct, awarding PLAINTIFFS punitive damages.
  14 DATED: January 31, 2025 15

  GREENBERG GROSS LLP
  By:
  /s/ Jemma E. Dunn
  Alan A. Greenberg
  Nevada Bar No. 15922
  Jemma E. Dunn
  Nevada Bar No. 16229
  Attorneys for [Plaintiff] Zimmerman
  -11-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

  JURY DEMAND
  PLAINTIFF hereby demands a jury trial of all the issues in the above-entitled matter.
  Case 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC Document 4 Filed 01/31/25 Page 12 of 12
  DATED: January 31, 2025
  GREENBERG GROSS LLP
  By:
  /s/ Jemma E. Dunn
  Alan A. Greenberg
  Nevada Bar No. 15922
  Jemma E. Dunn
  Nevada Bar No. 16229
  Attorneys for [Plaintiff] Zimmerman
  -12-
  AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

• 2. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA [REDACTED], Plaintiff(s), vs. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, et al., Defendant(s)

  • 20250722
  • News article
  • Justia

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
  18
  19
  20
  21
  22
  23
  24
  25
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
  DISTRICT OF NEVADA
  [REDACTED],
  Plaintiff(s),
  vs.
  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, et
  al.,
  Defendant(s).
  2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC
  ORDER
  Pending before the Court is defendant Karey Zimmerman’s Motion for Extension of Time (ECF
  No. 20). While it is not clear from the motion what defendant seeks an extension for, the Court construes
  his motion to seek an extension of time to respond the Amended Complaint. See Erickson v. Pardus,
  551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 167 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (2007) (“A document filed pro se is ‘to be liberally
  construed[.]’”). Defendant states that he was initially granted a 45-day extension by plaintiff to secure
  legal representation. ECF No. 20 at 1. It is not clear from the docket whether parties filed a stipulation to
  that extent. Defendant states that he sought another extension from plaintiff on June 16, 2025, because
  he was “experiencing significant medical issues.” Id. Defendant reports that he has not received a
  response from opposing counsel regarding the extension. See ECF No. 20 at 1. Defendant
  Pursuant to Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a defendant must serve an
  answer within 21-days after being served with the summons and complaint” or “within 60 days” if it has
  “timely waived service.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). Defendant was served on April 26, 2025. See ECF
  No. 13. There is no indication that defendant Zimmerman waived service. Therefore, the time to file an
  answer was 21-days from the date of service, i.e., May 19, 2025. Defendant filed his Motion for
  Extension of Time on July 2, 2025. See ECF No. 20. Therefore, defendant’s motion is untimely.
  However, the Court acknowledges that defendant’s pro se status may require additional time to file a
  response and grants the motion for extension of time. Defendant shall respond the plaintiff’s Amended
  Complaint (ECF No. 4) by no later than August 15, 2025.
  Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al Doc. 28
  Dockets.Justia.com
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
  18
  19
  20
  21
  22
  23
  24
  25
  Defendant states that he is searching for legal representation. The Court cautions defendant that
  he must proceed with the case and may not wait until he has secured counsel, Therefore, the Court
  cautions defendant that should he continue to remain unrepresented in the future he must abide by both
  the Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For example, this district’s Local Rules provides
  that requests for extension after the expiration of a specified period will not be granted unless the
  movant demonstrates excusable neglect. See LR IA 6-1. Even pro se litigants must comply with the
  Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the court in which litigation is proceeding. E.g.
  King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987); see also Jacobsen v. Filler, 790 F.2d 1362, 1364 (9th
  Cir. 1986) ("pro se litigants in the ordinary civil case should not be treated more favorable than parties
  with attorneys of record"); Carter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 784 F.2d 1006, 1008 (9th Cir. 1986)
  (pro se litigants expected to abide by the rules of the court in which litigation proceeds).
  ACCORDINGLY,
  IT IS ORDERED that:
  1. The Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED.
  2. Defendant Zimmerman shall respond to the Amended Complaint by no later than August 15,
  2025.
  DATED this 22nd day of July 2025.
  IT IS SO ORDERED.
  _________________________
  Hon. Maximiliano D. Couvillier III
  United States Magistrate Judge
  NOTICE
  Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and
  recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk
  of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
  10
  11
  12
  13
  14
  15
  16
  17
  18
  19
  20
  21
  22
  23
  24
  25
  may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified
  time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985).
  This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2)
  failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District
  Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d
  1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
  Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any
  change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney,
  or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may
  result in dismissal of the action.

• 3. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al

  • 20250130
  • News article
  • Justia

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al
  Plaintiff: [REDACTED]
  Defendant: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Karey Zimmerman
  Case Number: 2:2025cv00206
  Filed: January 30, 2025
  Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
  Presiding Judge: Maximiliano D Couvillier
  Referring Judge: Cristina D Silva
  Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
  Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
  Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
  RSS RSS Track this Docket
  Docket Report

  This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
  Date Filed Document Text
  March 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III. Judge Couvillier's Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
  March 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 3 Notice for Desig of Local Counsel & VP, addressed to Anne Andrews. (CAH)
  February 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 6 Order addressed to Anne Andrews. (CAH)
  February 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva. Judge Silva's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
  January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by [REDACTED]. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Dunn, Jemma)
  January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Nicole Zimmerman. No changes to parties. (Dunn, Jemma)
  January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Anne Andrews to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. The form is available on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is required to register for the court's electronic filing system at PACER #www.pacer.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 2/14/2025. (no image attached) (MAM)
  January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Karey Zimmerman re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (MAM)
  January 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III. (MAM)
  January 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7941742) by Nicole Zimmerman. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/9/2025. Proof of service due by 4/30/2025. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons re The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, #3 Summons Summons re Karey Zimmerman) (Dunn, Jemma) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

• 4. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al

  • 20250130
  • News article
  • Unicourt

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  UniCourt Logo

  Coverage
  Contact

  Log In
  Sign Up
  This case was last updated from U.S. District Courts on 10/29/2025 at 18:25:15 (UTC).

  Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al
  Case Summary
  On 01/30/2025 Zimmerman filed a Civil - Personal Injury and Torts lawsuit against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, Nevada District. The Judges overseeing this case are Cristina D. Silva and Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III. The case status is Open.

  Case Details

  Case Number

  2:25-cv-00206

  Filing Date

  01/30/2025

  Case Status

  Open

  Case Type

  Civil - Personal Injury and Torts

  Court

  U.S. District Courts

  Courthouse

  Nevada District

  Judge Details

  Presiding Judge

  Cristina D. Silva

  Referral Judge

  Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III

  Party Details

  Plaintiff

  [REDACTED]

  Defendants

  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

  Karey Zimmerman
  Attorney/Law Firm Details

  Plaintiff Attorneys

  Ryan M. McIntosh

  Kimberly M DeGonia

  Brittany Emsais

  Jemma Dunn

  Alan Greenberg

  Anne Andrews
  Court Documents
  #43

  (#43) ORDER granting #42 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (See Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 10/2/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA) (Entered: 10/02/2025)
  #42

  (#42) Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Responses due by 10/1/2025. (Kay, Rory) (Entered: 09/17/2025)
  #40

  (#40) ORDER Granting #27 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brittany Emsais for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  #39

  (#39) ORDER granting #26 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ryan McIntosh for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  #38

  (#38) ORDER Granting #25 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Anne Andrews for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  #37

  (#37) ORDER Granting #23 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kimberly DeGonia for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  #35

  (#35) MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Responses due by 8/22/2025. (Kay, Rory) (Entered: 08/08/2025)
  34 #1

  Exhibit Certificate of Standing of Ryan McIntosh
  #34

  (#34) DECLARATION of Ryab McIntosh in support of Pro Hac Vice Application re #26 Motion for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice - Verified Petition by Plaintiff Nicole Zimmerman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Standing of Ryan McIntosh)(Dunn, Jemma) (Entered: 08/05/2025)
  #7

  (#7) Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 6 Order addressed to Anne Andrews. (CAH) (Entered: 02/25/2025)
  #5

  (#5) CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Nicole Zimmerman. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Dunn, Jemma) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  #4

  (#4) AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Nicole Zimmerman. No changes to parties. (Dunn, Jemma) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  2 #1

  Summons
  #2

  (#2) SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Karey Zimmerman re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (MAM) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  1 #3

  Summons Summons re Karey Zimmerman
  1 #2

  Summons Summons re The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
  1 #1

  Civil Cover Sheet
  #1

  (#1) COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7941742) by Nicole Zimmerman. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/9/2025. Proof of service due by 4/30/2025. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons re The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, #3 Summons Summons re Karey Zimmerman) (Dunn, Jemma) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (Entered: 01/30/2025)
  36 More Documents Available
  View All Documents

  Docket Entries
  10/02/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#43) ORDER granting #42 MOTION to Stay Discovery. (See Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 10/2/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA) (Entered: 10/02/2025)
  09/17/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#42) Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Responses due by 10/1/2025. (Kay, Rory) (Entered: 09/17/2025)
  09/16/2025

  Docket(#41) CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1. Attorney ANNE ANDREWS is in violation of Local Rule IC 2-1(a) and 2-1(d). You are required to register to file documents electronically in the Court's electronic filing system (CM/ECF) and the electronic service of pleadings and other papers. Please visit the PACER website www.pacer.gov to complete the registration. (no image attached) (LE) (Entered: 09/16/2025)
  [+] Read More
  09/08/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#40) ORDER Granting #27 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brittany Emsais for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  [+] Read More
  09/08/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#39) ORDER granting #26 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ryan McIntosh for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  [+] Read More
  09/08/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#38) ORDER Granting #25 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Anne Andrews for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  [+] Read More
  09/08/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#37) ORDER Granting #23 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kimberly DeGonia for Nicole Zimmerman and approving Designation of Local Counsel for Attorney Jemma E. Dunn. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 9/8/2025. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's e-filng system shall register on the PACER website #www.pacer.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) (Entered: 09/09/2025)
  [+] Read More
  08/29/2025

  Docket(#36) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 8/29/2025. ORDER denying #35 Motion to Stay Case; Re: #35 Motion to Stay Case or Discovery. The Motion to Stay Discovery at ECF No. 35 by plaintiff and defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is DENIED without prejudice. The Certificate of Service attached to the motion states service was made only electronically via the CM/ECF system. However, the docket does not show that defendant Karey Zimmerman, who has appeared (ECF No. 20), is registered for electronic service. The parties may have leave to refile and serve the motion. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MDC) (Entered: 08/29/2025)
  [+] Read More
  08/08/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#35) MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Responses due by 8/22/2025. (Kay, Rory) (Entered: 08/08/2025)
  08/05/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#34) DECLARATION of Ryab McIntosh in support of Pro Hac Vice Application re #26 Motion for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice - Verified Petition by Plaintiff Nicole Zimmerman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Standing of Ryan McIntosh)(Dunn, Jemma) (Entered: 08/05/2025)
  24 More Docket Entries
  View All Docket Entries
  03/26/2025

  Docket(#9) STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III. Judge Couvillier's Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) (Entered: 03/26/2025)
  03/21/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#8) Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 3 Notice for Desig of Local Counsel & VP, addressed to Anne Andrews. (CAH) (Entered: 03/21/2025)
  02/24/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#7) Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 6 Order addressed to Anne Andrews. (CAH) (Entered: 02/25/2025)
  02/03/2025

  Docket(#6) STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva. Judge Silva's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS) (Entered: 02/03/2025)
  01/31/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#5) CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Nicole Zimmerman. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Dunn, Jemma) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  01/31/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#4) AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Nicole Zimmerman. No changes to parties. (Dunn, Jemma) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  01/31/2025

  Docket(#3) NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Anne Andrews to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. The form is available on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is required to register for the court's electronic filing system at PACER #www.pacer.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 2/14/2025. (no image attached) (MAM) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  [+] Read More
  01/31/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#2) SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Karey Zimmerman re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (MAM) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  01/30/2025

  DocketCase randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III. (MAM) (Entered: 01/31/2025)
  01/30/2025
  View Court Documents

  Docket(#1) COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7941742) by Nicole Zimmerman. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/9/2025. Proof of service due by 4/30/2025. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons re The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, #3 Summons Summons re Karey Zimmerman) (Dunn, Jemma) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (Entered: 01/30/2025)
  [+] Read More
  related-case-search

  Dig Deeper

  Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases

  Latest cases represented by Lawyer MS ANN-MARTHA ANDREWS
  Technoir, LLC v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company

  U.S. District Courts | Commercial and Trade - Insurance | 2:26-cv-00540 | 2026-02-26
  Force v. Lifemap Assurance Company

  U.S. District Courts | Labor and Employment - Employee Benefit | 2:25-cv-01054 | 2025-11-19
  Warnick v. Lifemap Assurance Company

  U.S. District Courts | Labor and Employment - Employee Benefit | 2:25-cv-00910 | 2025-10-14

  Latest cases represented by Lawyer ALAN ASHER GREENBERG
  Petruss Media Group LLC et al v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC et al

  U.S. District Courts | Civil | 8:25-cv-00835 | 2025-04-22
  Petruss Media Group LLC et al v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC et al

  U.S. District Courts | Civil | 8:25-mc-00006 | 2025-02-28
  Blocton v. Flowers Baking Co. of Henderson, LLC

  U.S. District Courts | Civil - Personal Injury and Torts | 2:24-cv-02304 | 2024-12-11

  Why is this public record being published online?
  FOR LAW FIRMS

  Docket Research
  Litigation Strategy
  Docket Tracking
  Experience Management

  FOR INSURANCE

  Litigation Risk and Strategy
  Master Data Management

  PRODUCTS

  UniCourt DART
  UniCourt DEEP
  Integrations

  OTHER

  Coverage
  Contact
  Pricing
  Blog

  RESOURCES

  UniCourt vs PACER
  PACER Data API
  Careers
  Federal Court Records
  State Court Records
  API Documentation

  LEGAL

  General Disclaimer
  Terms of Service
  Cancellation and Refund Policy
  Privacy Policy
  Public Records Policy

  CONNECT WITH US
  Linkedin
  X
  Youtube
  Facebook
  Instagram
  UniCourt Logo
  © 2026 UniCourt Inc. All rights reserved.

  UniCourt uses cookies to improve your online experience, for more information please see our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use this website, you agree to UniCourt’s General Disclaimer, Terms of Service, Cancellation and Refund Policy, Privacy Policy, and Public Records Policy. If you do not agree with these terms, then do not use our website and/or services.

• 5. ZIMMERMAN v. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS

  • 20260423
  • News article
  • Leagle

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  ZIMMERMAN v. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
  Case No. 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC.

  View Case

  [REDACTED], Plaintiff, v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, et al., Defendants.

  United States District Court, D. Nevada.

  April 23, 2026.
  Order Granting the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint

  CRISTINA D. SILVA, District Judge.
  [ECF No. 48]

  Plaintiff [REDACTED] brings this action against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS) and Karey Zimmerman, alleging (1) a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) against both defendants...

• 6. Vista Serena Showcase / Karey Zimmerman - Project Coordinator

  • 20260630
  • News article
  • KNB Associates

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  Karey Zimmerman - Project Coordinator

  Karey Zimmerman has been working in the Design Field for 35+ years. Recently shifting his focus to high-end custom homes, Karey has spent many years working directly with (and for) contractors, and engineers coordinating all disciplines to ensure a seamless process of design and construction.

  To learn more, contact Karey Zimmerman at [REDACTED]

• 7. Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al

  • 20250130
  • News article
  • Pacer Monitor

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al
  Nevada District Court
  Judge: Cristina D Silva
  Referred: Maximiliano D Couvillier, III
  Case #: 2:25-cv-00206
  Nature of Suit 360 Torts - Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury
  Cause 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
  Case Filed: Jan 30, 2025

  Docket
  Parties (3)

  Docket last updated: 11 hours ago
  Tuesday, June 23, 2026
  61 2 pgs order Order on Stipulation Wed 06/24 12:06 PM
  ORDER Granting60 Stipulation to Extend Reply Re:58 Motion to Dismiss Replies are due by 7/1/2026. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 6/23/2026. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
  60 motion Stipulation Tue 06/23 10:47 AM
  STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Reply in Support re58 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.. (Kay, Rory) (extend) (sumjgm)
  Wednesday, June 17, 2026
  59 respm Response Wed 06/17 3:13 PM
  RESPONSE to58 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff [REDACTED]. Replies are due by 6/24/2026. (DeGonia, Kimberly)

• 8. [REDACTED],Plaintiff v. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (a corporation), KAREY ZIMMERMAN (an individual), and DOES 1-500, Inclusive, Defendants

  • 20260623
  • News article
  • Justia

  • original
  • archived
  • back to list

  12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Pat Lundvall (NSBN 3761) Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416) McDONALD CARANO LLP2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102Telephone: (702) 873-4100 plundvall@mcdonaldcarano.com rkay@mcdonaldcarano.com Attorneys for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF NEVADA NICOLE ZIMMERMAN,Plaintiff v. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (a corporation), KAREY ZIMMERMAN (an individual), and DOES 1-500, Inclusive, Defendants Case No. 2:25-cv-00206-CDS-MDC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (First Request)Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (“Church”) and Plaintiff Nicole Zimmerman ( collectively “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline for Church to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim: 1.On May 6, 2026, Zimmerman filed a Third Amended Complaint alleging one causeof action against the Church. See ECF No. 55. 2.The Parties stipulated, and the Court ordered, that the Church’s time to file a responseto the Third Amended Complaint would be extended until June 3, 2026. ECF No. 57. The Church filed its Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (“Motion”) on June 3, 2026. ECF No. 58. / / /[ECF No. 60]Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et alDoc. 61Dockets.Justia.com
  1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272823.Zimmerman filed her Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Church’s Motion onJune 17, 2026. ECF No. 59. 4.To allow the Church adequate time to prepare its reply in support of its Motion,Zimmerman and the Church therefore stipulate and agree to extend the Church’s deadline to file the reply from June 24, 2026 to July 1, 2026. 5.This is the first stipulation for an extension of time for the Church to file a reply insupport of its Motion. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, by their respective counsel, that with the permission of the Court, the Church’s deadline to file a reply in support of its Motion shall be July 1, 2026. Dated this 23rd day of June, 2026 McDONALD CARANOLLPBy: /s/ Rory T. KayPat Lundvall (NSBN 3761) Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416) 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102Attorneys for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day SaintsGREENBERG GROSS LLPBy: /s/ Ryan M. McIntosh Alan A. Greenberg (NSBN 15922) Jemma E. Dunn (NSBN 16229) 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 730 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135Anne Andrews (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)Kimberly M. DeGonia (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Ryan M. McIntosh (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)Brittany Emsais (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)ANDREWS & THORNTON4701 Von Karman Ave, Ste. 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attorneys for PlaintiffIT IS SO ORDERED:UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGEDATED:June 23, 2026